## Neil Badmington (2020). *An Undefined Something Else: Barthes, Culture, Neutral Life*. : . Author(s): [[Authors/Neil Badmington]] Zotero Link: [An Undefined Something Else: Barthes, Culture, Neutral Life](zotero://select/items/@badmington_undefined_2020) Index: ### Related ### Summary: 이 논문은 중립이 나중에 바르트가 중립에 초점을 맞춘 것에 비추어 문화 분석의 활동 자체를 어떻게 다르게 생각하도록 초대하는지에 대해 질문합니다.” ([Badmington, 2020, p. 65](zotero://open-pdf/library/items/V69YGGMG?page=1&annotation=DFDB5ED9)) ### Notes: 최근 들어서 2010년대에 들어서 바르트의 죽음 후 글들이 출판되고 있으며 "it has called for reconsideration” ([Badmington, 2020, p. 65](zotero://open-pdf/library/items/V69YGGMG?page=1&annotation=XMP47B37)) “in death he has found new lives, other lives, plural lives.” ([Badmington, 2020, p. 1](zotero://open-pdf/library/items/V69YGGMG?page=1&annotation=5AV3JDEL)) 새롭게 출판된 바르트의 글들: - teaching notes - Barthes, Roland (2007) Le Discours amoureux: Séminaire à l’Ecole pratique deshautes e ́tudes 1974–1976, ed. Coste C. Paris: Seuil. - Barthes, Roland (2010a) Le Lexique de l’auteur: Séminaire à l’École pratique des hautes êtudes 1973–1974, suivi de fragments inédits du Roland Barthes par Roland Barthes, ed. Pierrot AH. Paris: Seuil. - Barthes, R., Briggs, K. and Léger, N. (2011) _The Preparation of the Novel: Lecture Courses and Seminars at the Collège De France, 1978-1979 and 1979-1980_. New York: Columbia University Press (European perspectives: a series in social thought and cultural criticism). - Barthes, Roland (2013) How To Live Together: Novelistic Simulations of Some Everyday Spaces, trans. Briggs K. New York: Columbia University Press. - two journals - Barthes, Roland (2011) Travels in China, trans. Brown A. Cambridge: Polity, 2011. - 바르트는 1974년에 중국을 여행함 - Barthes, Roland (2010) Mourning Diary: October 26, 1977–September 15, 1979, ed. Léger N, trans. Howard R. New York: Hill and Wang. - a late account of modernity - Barthes, Roland (2010c) Phrase – Modernité. Genesis 30: 239–283. - the letters, notes and short texts of the centenary Album - Barthes, R. and Gladding, J. (2018) _Album: Unpublished Correspondence and Texts_. 바르트가 소쉬르의 영향을 받고 ‘The Kitchen of Meaning’에서 쓴 “This at least: all are signs” ^[Barthes, Roland (1994) The Semiotic Challenge, trans. Howard R. Berkeley: University of California Press, p. 157] 처럼 그에게 있어서 > “as Mythologies makes clear, the project is to track down ruthlessly the ‘ideological abuse’ in ‘the decorative display of what-goes-without-saying’" ([[@barthes_mythologies_2006]], xix) 이렇게 초기의 바르트는 the semiological Barthes who exposes ‘ideological abuse’ and wishes exemption from meaning from the world where is trapped by language. 이러한 초기 바르트의 대표격인 글들이 바로 - The Death of the Author’ in 1967 (1986: 54), - Empire of Signs in 1970 (1983: 73–6), - and in Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes in 1975 (1995: 87) 가 있다. 그리고 후기에 들어와서 바르트는 “Neutral treated the desire with fresh and fuller force” ([Badmington, 2020, p. 68](zotero://open-pdf/library/items/V69YGGMG?page=4&annotation=BZKVGVNP)) at the stake in an ethics of language. The Neutral concerns “every inflection that, dodging or baffling the paradigmatic, oppositional structure of meaning, aims at the suspension of the conflictual basis of [[discourse]]’ ([[@barthes_neutral_2005]], 211) Which is the Desire of ‘thought and practice of the non-conflictual’ ([[@barthes_neutral_2005]], 44) > “In short, Western tradition is problematic for me in this: not because it decides that conflict exists, that the world is conflictual, but: because it transforms conflict into a nature and a value (or, another version of the same refusal: making a value out of nature). ([[@barthes_neutral_2005]], 126) > “naturalization of conflict” ([Badmington, 2020, p. 69](zotero://open-pdf/library/items/V69YGGMG?page=5&annotation=LR7D776W)) 바르트가 이러한 일화를 가장 강하게 느낀 이야기 > “Barthes explains, he followed polite social convention and opened the conversation with the remark, ‘The weather was nice yester- day’ (2005: 113). In reply to such a comment, he notes, ‘one might expect yes/no (and rather more yes, since the subject is not conflictual!)’ (2005: 113).10 He was surprised, then, when the woman replied ‘It was hot’, for this response ‘neither affirms nor denies the nice weather, \[but\] displaces the paradigm toward another paradigm, indeed another value’ ([[@barthes_neutral_2005]], 113) 바르트의 뉴트럴은 블랑숏과 다른 뉴트럴, 그에게는 > The Neutral, as imagined by Barthes in the course of 1977–8, offers alternatives, flight, respite, exemption, suspension [...] “the ethics of language’,” ([Badmington, 2020, p. 70](zotero://open-pdf/library/items/V69YGGMG?page=6&annotation=XQXL3LMH)) 즉 이중성에 잡혀있는 언어의 세상에서 visibles = signs 의 세상에서 언어의 윤리 그리고 그러한 윤리를 실행하기 위한 strategies for living, "for inhabiting and interpreting culture with nuanced tact" ([Badmington, 2020, p. 70](zotero://open-pdf/library/items/V69YGGMG?page=6&annotation=XQXL3LMH))이라고 할 수 있다. 그렇다면 뉴트럴을 향한 욕망은 무엇을 향한 욕망인가? 1. first: suspension (épochè) of orders, laws, summons, arrogances, terrorisms, puttings on notice, demands, the will-to-possess. 2. then, by way of deepening, refusal of pure [[discourse]] of opposition. Suspension of narcissism: no longer to be afraid of images (imago): to dissolve one’s own image (a wish that borders on the negative mystical [[discourse]], or Zen or Tao). ([[@barthes_neutral_2005]], 12-3) 즉 중지와 거부를 향한 욕망이 아닐까? 판단의 중지와 판단을 통한 전개의 거부. 이러한 예시중 하나가 바로 *weariness*가 있다. > “Quoting Blanchot, Barthes observes that weari- ness is ‘a state that is not possessive’, ([[@barthes_neutral_2005]], 20) an ‘intensity’ ([[@barthes_neutral_2005]], 18) which outplays the conventional coding of everyday life.” ([Badmington, 2020, p. 71](zotero://open-pdf/library/items/V69YGGMG?page=7&annotation=ZRVAAVV8)) “Signs are too cunning, too subtle, too stubborn, too strong.” ([Badmington, 2020, p. 8](zotero://select/library/items/H69C3NNR)) ([pdf](zotero://open-pdf/library/items/V69YGGMG?page=8&annotation=KH8AG6KB)) “In ‘Mythology Today’, in 1971, the shift is from the sign (which Saussure had, of course, understood to be the union of signifiant and signifie´) to a ‘science of the signifier’ whose ‘goal is not so much the analysis of the sign as its dislocation’ (1986: 66).” ([Badmington, 2020, p. 8](zotero://select/library/items/H69C3NNR)) ([pdf](zotero://open-pdf/library/items/V69YGGMG?page=8&annotation=HIT59UG4)) “This is evidently a Barthes who has read the early Derrida and come to recognize that the signified is, as Of Grammatology puts it, ‘always already in the position of the signifier’ (Derrida, 1976: 73, emphasis in original)” ([Badmington, 2020, p. 8](zotero://select/library/items/H69C3NNR)) ([pdf](zotero://open-pdf/library/items/V69YGGMG?page=8&annotation=L9ZJ29IB)) “a mythological endoxa has been created: demystification (or demythification) has itself become a [[discourse]], a corpus of phrases, a catechistic statement’ (1986: 66).” ([Badmington, 2020, p. 8](zotero://select/library/items/H69C3NNR)) ([pdf](zotero://open-pdf/library/items/V69YGGMG?page=8&annotation=5MVXCA99))