## Scott C. Richmond (2016). *Cinema's Bodily Illusions: Flying, Floating, and Hallucinating*. : University of Minnesota Press. > [!INFO] > Type:: [[book]] > Title:: Cinema's Bodily Illusions: Flying, Floating, and Hallucinating > Author(s): [[Scott C. Richmond]] > Year:: 2016 > Tags:: > DOI:: > Citekey:: richmond_cinemas_2016 > ZoteroURI:: [Open in Zotero: Cinema's Bodily Illusions: Flying, Floating, and Hallucinating](zotero://select/items/@richmond_cinemas_2016) > ReviewedDate:: [[2023-07-04]] ## Citation ```latex [@richmond_cinemas_2016] ``` ## Related ```dataview TABLE file.aliases AS "Title" FROM [[@richmond_cinemas_2016]] and -"Plans" and -"resources" ``` ## Summary - ## Annotation “My interest in Cinema’s Bodily Illusions lies not in the superficial similarity of their shared setting but rather in the aesthetic ends to which this setting is put: Gravity and 2001 are both centrally concerned with the perception of space as an embodied phenomenon and the modulation of this embodied perception of space as a fundamental aesthetic affordance of the cinema.” (Richmond, 2016, p. 4) 글쓴이는 proprioceptive aesthetic이란 개념을 통해 자신의 주장을 진행시키는데 “As Steven Shaviro shows, aesthetics names not only the philosophy of art or regimes of artistic practice but also the study of our modes of receptivity to the world.” (Richmond, 2016, p. 8) Steven Shaviro, Without Criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and Aesthetics (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2009), 5, 66, and passim. 즉 이 [[proprioceptive aesthetic]]은 공간에 대한 나의 감각과 orienting myself in space의 과정을 modulating하는 것을 포함한다. 또한 subtle sense, > “it also includes a more subtle sense, modulating and elaborating my modes of relation to the world and, in the same move, to myself.” (Richmond, 2016, p. 8) 그러므로 [[proprioceptive aesthetic]]은 세가지를 동시에 의미한다. 1.  a set of possibilities in and vocations of the cinema understood as an arrangement of technologies or a technical system; 2. a set of films that take up a particularly productive relation to these possibilities and vocations; and 3. a broader field of aesthetic practices and aesthetic media, not at all limited to the cinema, wherein the paradoxically double presence of the body—its illusory presence in a world unfolding onscreen and its ordinary presence in the world—is the focus of aesthetic elaboration.” (Richmond, 2016, p. 9) “Cinema’s Bodily Illusions is not about films but about the cinema. It offers a theory of the cinema in which the modulation of perception is its primary aesthetic vocation, phenomenological import, and technological work.” (Richmond, 2016, p. 9) ### Related ```dataview LIST FROM [[@richmond_cinemas_2016]] and -"Plans" and -"resources" ```