## Bernard Stiegler (2011). Technics and Time 3 _Cinematic Time and the Question of Malaise_. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press. Author(s): [[Authors/Bernard Stiegler]] Zotero Link: [Technics and time, 3: cinematic time and the question of malaise](zotero://select/items/@stiegler_technics_2011) Index: ### Related ### Summary: Deleuze is certainly correct in objecting to Bergson's idea that the production of illusion is- "also its correction, in a certain way." But he still does not draw out all of the consequences of his own argument-precisely *because he does not take into account the specificity of this reproduction as a technique of analogico-photographic recording integrating* the Barthesian "that-has-been," and as the fusion of instantaneous poses within the *flux of a temporal object*. Thus, it seems, he fails to explain what it means to have "always had cinema without realizing it," and thus to account for the power ofthe animated image. (13) ^91c791 #Comments time of the material time of the image ### Notes: